Does ‘workfare’ work? The Norwegian experience
- 10 October 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in International Journal of Social Welfare
- Vol. 12 (4), 274-288
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9671.00282
Abstract
The aim in this article is to examine the recruitment process to workfare programmes in the Norwegian municipalities and determine whether these programmes actually enhance self‐sufficiency. The design of the study is quasi‐experimental. The programme group consists of 300 people and the comparison group of a 10% sample of 1,559 non‐participating social assistance recipients from 40 local social service administrations in 1995. In the Norwegian workfare schemes, recruitment according to ‘need’, i.e. labour market problems and lack of human resources, appears to be the dominating approach. The workfare schemes do not produce significant effects, either on employment or on earnings. These results are supported by analyses of a number of observed variables and of two models applied to deal with unobserved selection bias: the parametric Heckman model and the semi‐parametric maximum score model.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Social Sciences for Knowledge and Decision MakingPublished by Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) ,2001
- An Offer You Can't Refuse'Published by Bristol University Press ,2001
- Nonparametric EconometricsPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1999
- The Inclusive Society?Published by Springer Nature ,1998
- Symbolic purposes and factual consequences of the concepts “self‐reliance” and “dependency” in contemporary discourses on welfareScandinavian Journal of Social Welfare, 1998
- Semiparametric analysis of discrete responseJournal of Econometrics, 1985
- Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit ModelsPublished by SAGE Publications ,1984
- Sample Selection Bias as a Specification ErrorEconometrica, 1979