Reliability of the draft diagnostic criteria for research of ICD‐10 in comparison with ICD‐10 and DSM‐III‐R
- 1 October 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
- Vol. 84 (4), 332-335
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1991.tb03155.x
Abstract
The reliability and ease of use of DSM-III-R and the clinical and research versions of ICD-10 were assessed by 5 psychiatrists working in pairs. They diagnosed 60 patients. All 3 systems showed similar and high interrater and intersystem agreement for major diagnostic categories but not for subcategories. A number of implications of these results are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Australasian Field Trials of the Mental and Behavioural Disorders Section of the Draft ICD-10Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 1990
- ICD-10 Field Trial in German-Speaking Countries - Summary, Judgement and PerspectivesPharmacopsychiatry, 1990
- The Development of DSM-IVArchives of General Psychiatry, 1990
- An Overview of the Prospective ICD-10 Classification of Mental DisordersThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1989
- A Comparison of Two Diagnostic MethodsArchives of General Psychiatry, 1985
- Diagnostic Criteria for Use in Psychiatric ResearchArchives of General Psychiatry, 1972
- Diagnostic Criteria of American and British PsychiatristsArchives of General Psychiatry, 1971