Implications of Removing a Normal Appendix
- 16 May 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by S. Karger AG in Digestive Surgery
- Vol. 20 (3), 215-221
- https://doi.org/10.1159/000070388
Abstract
Background: The diagnosis of acute appendicitis remains difficult and therefore 15–30% of the removed appendices appear to be normal. The aim of this study was to investigate morbidity, mortality and costs of removing a normal appendix in patients with suspected appendicitis. Patients and Methods: Retrospective study of patients who underwent a negative appendectomy for suspected appendicitis in the period 1991–1999 with a median follow-up of 4.4 years. Patients who underwent an elective appendectomy or appendectomy for other reasons were excluded. Results: In 285 patients (70% women, 30% men) a normal appendix was removed. In 192 (67%) patients a muscle-splitting incision was performed, in 6 (2%) a median laparotomy, and in 51 (18%) the normal appendix was removed by laparoscopy. In 36 patients (13%) a diagnostic laparoscopy was converted to a muscle-splitting incision. Complications occurred in 16 (6%) patients, in 5 (2%) a re-operation was needed. The mean hospital stay was 4.4 (SE 2.8) days, in case of complications 7.4 (SE 4.2) days. The mean extra hospital costs of a negative appendectomy were EUR 2,712. Conclusion: The removal of a normal appendix has considerable complications and costs. In an attempt to prevent these costs, extra diagnostic tools should be considered. Expensive diagnostic tools such as diagnostic laparoscopy should be used selectively in order not to further increase costs.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Diagnostic laparoscopy in 1043 patients with suspected acute appendicitisBritish Journal of Surgery, 2003
- Scoring and diagnostic laparoscopy for suspected appendicitisBritish Journal of Surgery, 2003
- Suspected acute appendicitis: trends in management over 30 yearsBritish Journal of Surgery, 2001
- A normal appendix found during diagnostic laparoscopy should not be removedBritish Journal of Surgery, 2001
- Why Does the Clinical Diagnosis Fail in Suspected Appendicitis?The European Journal of Surgery, 2000
- The History Is Important in Patients with Suspected Acute Appendicitis / with Invited CommentaryDigestive Surgery, 2000
- Neuroimmune appendicitisThe Lancet, 1999
- Is There a Role for Abdominal Computed Tomographic Scans in Appendicitis?Archives of Surgery, 1998
- Effect of Computed Tomography of the Appendix on Treatment of Patients and Use of Hospital ResourcesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Acute appendicitis—a clear-cut case in men, a guessing game in young womenSurgical Endoscopy, 1997