Response to Hays et al and McHorney and Cohen: Emergence of Item Response Modeling in Instrument Development and Data Analysis
- 1 September 2000
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medical Care
- Vol. 38 (9), II60-60
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200009002-00009
Abstract
In summary, readers are encouraged to read carefully the IRT articles in this special issue. They provide theoretical as well as practical arguments in favor of using IRT models in the health outcomes measurement field. At the same time, readers should be aware that the IRT field is complex and software is limited and, in my judgment, not very user friendly (although some packages are better than others). In addition, sample sizes will often need to be larger than in classical measurement, at least with the more general IRT models, and applications are rarely straightforward. Considerable practical experience is needed to ensure successful applications of IRT in the development and validation of instruments for health outcomes measurement.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Item Response Theory and Health Outcomes Measurement in the 21st CenturyMedical Care, 2000
- Response to Hays et al and McHorney and Cohen: A Discussion of Item Response Theory and Its Applications in Health Status AssessmentMedical Care, 2000
- Response to Hays et al and McHorney and Cohen: Practical Implications of Item Response Theory and Computerized Adaptive TestingMedical Care, 2000
- Equating Health Status Measures With Item Response TheoryMedical Care, 2000