The Antagonism of The Antibacterial Action of Mercury Compounds
- 1 December 1959
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology
- Vol. 11 (Supplement), 162T-168T
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7158.1959.tb10426.x
Abstract
The stoichiometric relations between mercuric chloride and the sulphydryl antagonists have been examined. In liquid cultures, cysteine, glutathione, dimercaprol and thioglycollate are effective as inactivators of mercuric chloride in quantities close to the theoretical amounts. When used to revive mercuric chloride-treated cells, larger amounts are needed, and horse serum is ineffective. The results obtained with E. coli I suggest it is not so resistant to the action of mercuric chloride over long periods as are Gram-positive organisms. Cells treated with mercuric chloride in the presence of a nutrient medium derive some protection from the constituents of the medium. Qualitative experiments show dimercaprol to be the most efficient antagonist and thioglycollate the least.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Sulphydryl Content of Horse SerumBritish Veterinary Journal, 1959
- THE USE OF ANTISEPTICS IN THE STERILISATION OF SOLUTIONS FOR INJECTIONJournal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 1951
- BRITISH PHARMACEUTICAL CONFERENCE HARROGATE, 1951Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 1951
- Factors Affecting the Germination of Thick Suspensions of Bacillus subtilis Spores in L-Alanine SolutionJournal of General Microbiology, 1950
- The Comparative Antibacterial Activity of O-Chloromercuriphenol and Phenylmercuric AcetateJournal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 1950
- MERCURIALS AS ANTISEPTICSAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1950
- CLEAR LIQUID MEDIUMS FOR THE "AEROBIC" CULTIVATION OF ANAEROBESJAMA, 1940