Formality and Informality in Communicative Events
- 1 December 1979
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in American Anthropologist
- Vol. 81 (4), 773-790
- https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1979.81.4.02a00020
Abstract
This paper examines the analytical utility of the concept of “formality” in social‐cultural anthropology, particularly the ethnography of communication. A survey of literature indicates that “formality” actually incorporates several distinct descriptive dimensions that do not necessarily correlate. Separating these dimensions facilitates the comparison of social occasions, viewed in terms of their communicational structure. The occasions compared here are political meetings among Wolof (Senegal), Mursi (Ethiopia), and Ilongots (Philippines). It is suggested that formality in communicative events can serve not only the force of tradition or the coercive power of a political establishment, but also creativity and change. [formality, political meetings, ethnography of communication, sociolinguistics, situational analysis]Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Purity and DangerPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2003
- Speech PlayPublished by University of Pennsylvania Press ,1976
- Speech events and natural speech: some implications for sociolinguistic methodologyLanguage in Society, 1976
- I have nothing to hide: The language of Ilongot oratoryLanguage in Society, 1973
- Some principles of linguistic methodologyLanguage in Society, 1972
- BILINGUAL USAGE IN PARAGUAYPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1968
- Readings in the Sociology of LanguagePublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1968
- Public Opinion Mechanisms Among Primitive PeoplesPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1937