Landslide hazard and risk zonation—why is it still so difficult?
Top Cited Papers
- 15 December 2005
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment
- Vol. 65 (2), 167-184
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-005-0023-0
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 76 references indexed in Scilit:
- Granular avalanches across irregular three‐dimensional terrain: 2. Experimental testsJournal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 2004
- Integrating a fuzzy k -means classification and a Bayesian approach for spatial prediction of landslide hazardJournal of Geographical Systems, 2003
- Landslide Laser Scanning: a new look at an old problemQuarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 2003
- Detection of a landslide movement as geometric misregistration in image matching of SPOT HRV data of two different datesInternational Journal of Remote Sensing, 2003
- Monitoring very slow slope movements by means of SAR interferometry: A case study from a mass waste above a reservoir in the Ötztal Alps, AustriaGeophysical Research Letters, 1999
- Rigorous landslide hazard zonation using Newmark's method and stochastic ground motion simulationSoil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1999
- Technical note Temporal remote sensing data and GIS application in landslide hazard zonation of part of Western ghat, IndiaInternational Journal of Remote Sensing, 1998
- Modelling uncertainty in natural resource analysis using fuzzy sets and Monte Carlo simulation: slope stability predictionInternational Journal of Geographical Information Science, 1997
- Landslide risk assessment and acceptable riskCanadian Geotechnical Journal, 1994
- The dynamics of avalanches of granular materials from initiation to runout. Part I: AnalysisActa Mechanica, 1991