Appropriate management of common bile duct stones: A RAND Corporation/UCLA Appropriateness Method statistical analysis
- 14 November 2009
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Surgical Endoscopy
- Vol. 24 (5), 1187-1194
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0748-0
Abstract
Bile duct stones affect 10% of patients who undergo a cholecystectomy and therefore represent a major health problem. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration, endoscopic sphincterotomy, and open surgical choledocholithotomy are the three available methods for dealing with choledocholithiasis. Though many trials and reviews have compared all three strategies, a list of indications for defined patient profiles is lacking. We employed the RAND Corporation/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RAM) to evaluate the three procedures for bile duct stone clearance. An expert panel judged appropriateness after a comprehensive bibliography review, a first-round private rating of 108 different clinical situations, a consensus meeting, and a second round of definitive rating. A list of indications for each procedure was statistically calculated. A consensus was reached for 41 indications (38%). The endoscopic approach was always appropriate for preoperatively diagnosed bile duct stones and inappropriate for patients with single intraoperative detected stones causing cholangitis and bile duct dilatation. Laparoscopic bile duct exploration was appropriate for preoperatively diagnosed choledocholithiasis if patients had not undergone a previous cholecystectomy and no signs of cholangitis were detected. The laparoscopic approach was also appropriate for intraoperatively incidentally detected stones, except for septic patients with poor performance status and multiple calculi. Laparoscopic bile duct clearance was judged inappropriate for septic patients with poor performance status and absence of bile duct dilatation. Open surgery was appropriate in all patients with intraoperative diagnosis of choledocholithiasis and cholangitis and in septic patients with bile duct dilatation. There was no clinical situation in which open surgery was appropriate when bile duct stones were preoperatively diagnosed. There is still uncertainty with respect to the management of choledocholithiasis, showing the need for further investigation. The RAM helps to elucidate appropriateness for the different treatment options in specific clinical settings.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct ExplorationAnnals of Surgery, 2008
- Meta-analysis of endoscopy and surgery versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones with the gallbladder in situBritish Journal of Surgery, 2006
- OncoSurge: A Strategy for Improving Resectability With Curative Intent in Metastatic Colorectal CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- A Prospective Study of Common Bile Duct Calculi in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic CholecystectomyAnnals of Surgery, 2004
- Laparoscopic common bile duct explorationSurgical Endoscopy, 2003
- Long-term results from laparoscopic common bile duct explorationSurgical Endoscopy, 2003
- Long-Term Prognosis After Treatment of Patients with CholedocholithiasisAnnals of Surgery, 2003
- Cost-effective management of common bile duct stonesSurgical Endoscopy, 2001
- Towards T-Tube Free Laparoscopic Bile Duct ExplorationAnnals of Surgery, 1998
- A Method for the Detailed Assessment of the Appropriateness of Medical TechnologiesInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1986