Playing Cat and Mouse at the U.S.-Mexican Border
Open Access
- 1 May 1992
- journal article
- Published by Duke University Press in Demography
- Vol. 29 (2), 159-180
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2061725
Abstract
Border control and apprehension activity represents a major element of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986. Does apprehending an undocumented migrant deter remigration? If it does not, does it change future migration behavior? I explore these questions by testing hypotheses about the effects of apprehension on the actual and desired length of stay in the United States and on the frequency of migration for undocumented Mexican male migrants. Results suggest that INS policy may well be backfiring. Migrants stay in the United States longer on non-apprehended trips and stay in Mexico for shorter spells between trips to compensate for the cost of a past apprehension.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impacts of the 1986 US Immigration Law on Emigration from Rural Mexican Sending CommunitiesPopulation and Development Review, 1989
- Undocumented Mexico—U.S. Migration and the Returns to Households in Rural MexicoAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1987
- Immigrant decisions concerning duration of stay and migratory frequencyJournal of Development Economics, 1987
- Econometric duration analysisJournal of Econometrics, 1984
- Profiles of Temporary Mexican Labor Migrants to the United StatesPopulation and Development Review, 1983
- Migration to the United States and Mexican Rural Development: A Case StudyAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1982
- Agrarian Structure and Labor Mobility in Rural MexicoPopulation and Development Review, 1982
- The Migrant Syndrome: Seasonal U.S. Wage Labor and Rural Development in Central MexicoHuman Organization, 1981
- Birds of PassagePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1979
- Patterns of U.S. migration from a Mexican sending community: a comparison of legal and illegal migrants.1979