Theoretical and practical differences between the Gorlin formula and the continuity equation for calculating aortic and mitral valve areas
- 1 June 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 67 (15), 1268-1272
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(91)90939-i
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prediction of the severity of aortic stenosis by Doppler aortic valve area determination: Prospective Doppler-catheterization correlation in 100 patientsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1988
- Value and limitations of Doppler echocardiography in the quantification of stenotic mitral valve area: comparison of the pressure half-time and the continuity equation methods.Circulation, 1988
- Doppler mitral pressure half-time: A clinical tool in search of theoretical justificationJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1987
- Advances in the hemodynamic assessment of stenotic cardiac valvesJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1987
- Calculations of cardiac valve stenosis: Restoring an old concept for advanced applicationsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1987
- Noninvasive estimation of valve area in patients with aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound and two-dimensional echocardiography.Circulation, 1985
- Pressure drops across prosthetic aortic heart valves under steady and pulsatile flow—In vitro measurementsJournal of Biomechanics, 1979
- Modified orifice equation for the calculation of mitral valve areaAmerican Heart Journal, 1972
- Estimation of valve area and “valvular resistance”American Heart Journal, 1953
- Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and central circulatory shunts. IAmerican Heart Journal, 1951