Hindsight bias and third-party consentors to warrantless police searches.
- 1 January 1991
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Law and Human Behavior
- Vol. 15 (3), 305-314
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01061715
Abstract
Research on hindsight bias indicates that awareness of event outcome influences how individuals interpret information and form judgments. We extend this earlier work to suggest that the effect of this bias on lay perceptions of third-party consent to warrantless searchers of residences may be contingent upon the presence verus absence of the search target(the suspect). A study using random assignment to experimental conditions in a between-subjects design explored this possibility. The experiment indicated that hindsight bias in perceived rights of the third-party consentor is influenced, not only by search outcome, but also by a web of overlapping and potentially competing social obligations and personal prerogatives, the salience of which is influenced by situational dynamics.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hindsight: Biased judgments of past events after the outcomes are known.Psychological Bulletin, 1990
- Juror decision making, attitudes, and the hindsight bias.Law and Human Behavior, 1989
- Third-Party Consent Searches: Legal vs. Social Perceptions of "Common Authority"1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1988
- Perceived Voluntariness of Consent to Warrantless Police Searches1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1988
- Intimacy in conversational style as a function of the degree of closeness between members of a dyad.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1985
- The Disadvantages of Hindsight in the Perception of SuicideJournal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1985
- Cognitive biases in blaming the victimJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1985
- Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit ModelsPublished by SAGE Publications ,1984
- International CommentsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1976
- Third Party Consent to Search and SeizureThe University of Chicago Law Review, 1966