The influence of activity importance and similarity on perception of recreation substitutes
- 1 January 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Leisure Sciences
- Vol. 9 (2), 77-86
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01490408709512148
Abstract
This study examines how substitutes are selected for a fly‐angling and camping recreation activity. Results show that although people choose substitutes similar to their intended activity, the degree of similarity between substitute and original is unrelated to perceived quality of substitute. Also, both the quality of a substitute and the number of available substitutes are inversely related to the importance of an activity's attributes. The lack of a relationship between activity/substitute similarity and quality of the substitute poses problems for application of the substitutability concept.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Process, goal, and social interaction differences in recreation: What makes an activity substitutableLeisure Sciences, 1981
- Activity Preferences and Participation: Conclusions From A Factor Analytic StudyJournal of Leisure Research, 1979
- Satisfactions Derived From Leisure-Time Pursuits: An Exploratory Nationwide SurveyJournal of Leisure Research, 1978
- Leisure Value Systems and Recreational Specialization: The Case of Trout FishermenJournal of Leisure Research, 1977
- The Substitutability Concept: A Need for Further DevelopmentJournal of Leisure Research, 1977
- Psychological Theories of Consumer ChoiceJournal of Consumer Research, 1976
- Perceived Similarities Among Recreational ActivitiesJournal of Leisure Research, 1976
- The Substitutability Concept: Implications for Recreation Research and ManagementJournal of Leisure Research, 1974
- Social Groups as a Basis for Assessing Participation in Selected Water ActivitiesJournal of Leisure Research, 1973
- Estimation of Net Social Benefits from Outdoor RecreationEconometrica, 1971