Comparison of stimuli used in sound field audiometric testing

Abstract

The problems associated with performing pure-tone threshold measurements [human] in reverberant or diffuse sound fields are illustrated with the use of 3-dimensional representations of the sound field within a typical test booth. A microphone mounted on a motorized trolley is used to perform these measurements. A comprehensive comparison is then made of the efficiency with which FM tones, AM tones, damped wave trains, and narrow bands of noise provide a uniform sound field. The bandwidth of the stimulus may be the major factor determining the uniformity of the field. A decision about the most appropriate stimulus for sound field work must be based on factors other than field uniformity. When the constraints of obtaining suitable spectral distributions, and being able to relate thresholds obtained with complex stimuli to those obtained with pure tones are also considered, FM tones and suitably generated narrow bands of noise appear to be the most suitable stimuli. The selection of suitable parameters and the spectrum and bandwidth of FM signals with different modulation waveforms are discussed. The relative accuracy of testing in the direct and reverberant regions in a nonanechoic environment is also discussed.