Different Classification Systems Yield Different Dementia Occurrence among Nonagenarians and Centenarians
- 1 December 2003
- journal article
- Published by S. Karger AG in Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders
- Vol. 17 (1-2), 35-41
- https://doi.org/10.1159/000074141
Abstract
Literature data consistently show different prevalence estimates of dementia when different classification systems are used in the same population. Very few data are available for the oldest old of the elderly. We investigated the occurrence of dementia among 34 nonagenarians and centenarians according to four classification systems: the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, third edition revised (DSM-III-R) and fourth edition (DSM-IV), the World Health Organization’s International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10), and the Cambridge Examination for Mental Disorders of the Elderly (CAMDEX). Cognitive functioning, work, social function and independence in activities of daily living were evaluated by using an extensive neuropsychological examination. The prevalence (95% CI) of dementia was the following: 47.1% (95% CI 30.3–63.8) with the DSM-III-R criteria, 41.2% (95% CI 24.6–57.7) with the DSM-IV criteria, 29.4% (95% CI 14.1–44.7) with the ICD-10 criteria and 38.2% (95% CI 21.9–54.6) with the CAMDEX. The factors that best predicted disagreement between DSM-III-R and DSM-IV were calculation impairment and the presence or absence of personality changes. DSM-III-R and ICD-10 were differentiated by the weight given to executive functions that all have to be impaired according to ICD-10, whereas progressive deterioration differentiated CAMDEX from DSM-III-R. It should be noted that although the DSM-III-R diagnoses differ by a factor of 1.6 times from the ICD-10 and 1.2 times from the CAMDEX diagnoses, we are speaking about dementia, which is very frequent in nonagenarians and centenarians. Moreover, with regard to public health, an estimation of the number of subjects who will lose their autonomy is rather more useful and informative than simple prevalence figures of dementia by itself. In this light, classification systems, such as the ICD-10, that do not include impairment of social function as a criterion for assessing dementia become less adequate.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Plasma amino acid concentrations in healthy and cognitively impaired oldest-old individuals: associations with anthropometric parameters of body composition and functional disabilityBritish Journal of Nutrition, 2002
- Cognitive Impairment and Mortality among Nonagenarians: The Danish 1905 Cohort SurveyDementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 2002
- The Influence of Education on Clinically Diagnosed Dementia Incidence and Mortality Data From the Kungsholmen ProjectArchives of Neurology, 2001
- Prevalence of dementia according to DSM–III–R and ICD–10The British Journal of Psychiatry, 2001
- Blood Micronutrient and Thyroid Hormone Concentrations in the Oldest-OldJournal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2000
- Aging and the Occurrence of DementiaArchives of Neurology, 1999
- Prevalence of Dementia in a Rural Netherlands Population and the Influence of DSM-III-R and CAMDEX Criteria for the Prevalence of Mild and More Severe FormsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1998
- Education and Alzheimer's disease: A review of recent international epidemiological studiesAging & Mental Health, 1997
- Is senile dementia "age-related" or "ageing-related"? —evidence from meta-analysis of dementia prevalence in the oldest oldThe Lancet, 1995
- “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinicianJournal of Psychiatric Research, 1975