Attentional bias for threat: Evidence for delayed disengagement from emotional faces
- 1 May 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Cognition and Emotion
- Vol. 16 (3), 355-379
- https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930143000527
Abstract
The present paper reports three new experiments suggesting that the valence of a face cue can influence attentional effects in a cueing paradigm. Moreover, heightened trait anxiety resulted in increased attentional dwell-time on emotional facial stimuli, relative to neutral faces. Experiment 1 presented a cueing task, in which the cue was either an “angry”, “happy”, or “neutral” facial expression. Targets could appear either in the same location as the face (valid trials) or in a different location to the face (invalid trials). Participants did not show significant variations across the different cue types (angry, happy, neutral) in responding to a target on valid trials. However, the valence of the face did affect response times on invalid trials. Specifically, participants took longer to respond to a target when the face cue was “angry” or “happy” relative to neutral. In Experiment 2, the cuetarget stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) was increased and an overall inhibition of return (IOR) effect was found (i.e., slower responses on valid trials). However, the “angry” face cue eliminated the IOR effect for both high and low trait anxious groups. In Experiment 3, threat-related and jumbled facial stimuli reduced the magnitude of IOR for high, but not for low, trait-anxious participants. These results suggest that: (i) attentional bias in anxiety may reflect a difficulty in disengaging from threat-related and emotional stimuli, and (ii) threat-related and ambiguous cues can influence the magnitude of the IOR effect.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Facial Expressions of Emotion: Are Angry Faces Detected More Efficiently?Cognition and Emotion, 2000
- The Face of Wrath: Critical Features for Conveying Facial ThreatCognition and Emotion, 1999
- Attentional Bias for Threatening Facial Expressions in Anxiety: Manipulation of Stimulus DurationCognition and Emotion, 1998
- BRIEF REPORT: Emotional Value of Information and its Relevance in the Interpretation of Homophones in AnxietyCognition and Emotion, 1996
- On the automatic nature of phobic fear: Conditioned electrodermal responses to masked fear-relevant stimuli.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1993
- Which are the stimuli in facial displays of anger and happiness? Configurational bases of emotion recognition.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1992
- Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1991
- Anxiety and the Allocation of Attention to ThreatThe Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 1988
- Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatiblesBehavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 1988
- Attentional bias in emotional disorders.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1986