Do decision support systems influence variation in prescription?
Open Access
- 30 January 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Health Services Research
- Vol. 9 (1), 1-15
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-20
Abstract
Translating scientific evidence into daily practice is problematic. All kinds of intervention strategies, using educational and/or directive strategies, aimed at modifying behavior, have evolved, but have been found only partially successful. In this article the focus is on (computerized) decision support systems (DSSs). DSSs intervene in physicians' daily routine, as opposed to interventions that aim at influencing knowledge in order to change behavior. We examined whether general practitioners (GPs) are prescribing in accordance with the advice given by the DSS and whether there is less variation in prescription when the DSS is used. Data were used from the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice (DNSGP2), collected in 2001. A total of 82 diagnoses, 749811 contacts, 133 physicians, and 85 practices was included in the analyses. GPs using the DSS daily were compared to GPs who do not use the DSS. Multilevel analyses were used to analyse the data. Two outcome measures were chosen: whether prescription was in accordance with the advice of the DSS or not, and a measure of concentration, the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI). GPs who use the DSS daily prescribe more according to the advice given in the DSS than GPs who do not use the DSS. Contradictory to our expectation there was no significant difference between the HHIs for both groups: variation in prescription was comparable. We studied the use of a DSS for drug prescribing in general practice in the Netherlands. The DSS is based on guidelines developed by the Dutch College of General Practitioners and implemented in the Electronic Medical Systems of the GPs. GPs using the DSS more often prescribe in accordance with the advice given in the DSS compared to GPs not using the DSS. This finding, however, did not mean that variation is lower; variation is the same for GPs using and for GPs not using a DSS. Implications of the study are that DSSs can be used to implement guidelines, but that it should not be expected that variation is limited.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Determinants of the range of drugs prescribed in general practice: a cross-sectional analysisBMC Health Services Research, 2007
- Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to successBMJ, 2005
- Effects of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems on Practitioner Performance and Patient OutcomesJAMA, 2005
- Monitoring health inequalities through general practice: the Second Dutch National Survey of General PracticeEuropean Journal of Public Health, 2005
- Medical CareMedical Care, 2001
- The Importance of Doctors’ and Patients’ Preferences in the Prescription DecisionJournal of Industrial Economics, 2000
- Computer-based Guideline Implementation Systems: A Systematic Review of Functionality and EffectivenessJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1999
- Rationalizing Medical Work: Decision-Support Techniques and Medical PracticesContemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 1998
- A Meta-analysis of 16 Randomized Controlled Trials to Evaluate Computer-Based Clinical Reminder Systems for Preventive Care in the Ambulatory SettingJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1996
- How physicians choose drugsSocial Science & Medicine, 1988