Accuracy of Clinical and Radiological Classification of the Jawbone Anatomy for Implantation—A Survey of 374 Patients
- 1 February 2004
- journal article
- Published by American Academy of Implant Dentistry in Journal of Oral Implantology
- Vol. 30 (1), 30-39
- https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2004)030<0030:aocarc>2.0.co;2
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the anatomical features of edentulous jaw dental segments (eJDS) in order to offer the most reliable clinical and radiological classification of such segments in planning for implant treatment. A total of 374 patients, 156 men and 218 women, participated in the investigation. The mean age of the patients was 46 years (SD 12.7), ranging between 17 and 73 years. The eJDS were estimated by means of orthopantomogram, computerized tomography, and intraorally with special ridge-mapping callipers for measurement of alveolar process width. A total of 792 screw-shaped and 1-stage Osteofix Dental Implant System (Oulu, Finland) implants were inserted. Dental segments were divided according to the results of the commonly accepted eJDS assessments into 3 clinical-anatomical types. Type I indicated insignificant or no atrophy of eJDS (232 patients with 476 implant sites; 60.1% of the total number). Type II indicated mild to moderate vertical or horizontal atrophy of eJDS (100 patients with 222 sites; 28% of the total number). Type III indicated significant vertical or horizontal atrophy of eJDS (42 patients with 94 sites; 11.9% of the total number). The accuracy of the clinical and radiological classification was adjudged to have been 95.8%. By the process of establishing clinical and radiological classification of the jawbone segments, more reliability was anticipated regarding the insertion of implants both in maxillae and mandibles.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Biologic outcome of implant‐supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulismClinical Oral Implants Research, 2002
- Descriptive and metric classification of jaw atrophy: An evaluation of 104 mandibles and 96 maxillae of dried skullsInternational Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, 1997
- General and local contraindications for endosseal implants ‐ an epidemiological panoramic radiograph study in 65‐year‐old subjectsCommunity Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 1995
- Maxillary sinus augmentation: Histomorphometric analysis of graft materials for maxillary sinus floor augmentationJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 1993
- Early failures in 4,641 consecutively placed Brånemark dental implantsImplant Dentistry, 1992
- Regeneration and enlargement of jaw bone using guided tissue regenerationClinical Oral Implants Research, 1990
- A classification of the edentulous jawsInternational Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, 1988
- Improved Technique for Localized Ridge Augmentation: A Report of 21 CasesThe Journal of Periodontology, 1985
- A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jawInternational Journal of Oral Surgery, 1981
- Residual alveolar ridge atrophy: Classification and influence of facial morphologyThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1979