EFFECTS OF PREMEDICATION ON DIPRIVAN INDUCTION
Open Access
- 1 September 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in British Journal of Anaesthesia
- Vol. 54 (9), 913-916
- https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/54.9.913
Abstract
The effects of three premeditation regimens were compared in 45 healthy patients in whom anaesthesia was induced with diprivan 2mgkg−1 i.v Premedication with diazepam 10 mg orally and droperidol 2.5–5 Omg and piritramide 7.5–15.0 mg i.m. resulted in less pain on injection and a more profound sleep froM.Dipnvan than premedication with diazepam 10 mg orally or no premedication. No differences in speed of induction were found when cessation of counting was used as a sign of unconsciousness. When the loss of eyelash reflex was used to define unconsciousness, the oral and i.m. premedication provided quicker induction after diprivan (39.3±2 9s) than no premedication (53.7±3.0s) (P<0.05) with no greater frequency of side-effects. Dose and rate of injection are the two most important factors influencing speed of induction.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- A STUDY OF THREE DOSES OF ICI 35 868 FOR INDUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF ANAESTHESIABritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1981
- PRELIMINARY EXPERIENCE WITH ICI 35 868 AS AN I.V. INDUCTION AGENT: COMPARISON WITH ALTHESINBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1980
- PHARMACOKINETICS IN LABORATORY ANIMALS OF ICI 35 868, A NEW I.V. ANAESTHETIC AGENTBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1980