PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION IN THE PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN RANGE OF 2.0 TO 3.9 NG/ML: VALUE OF PERCENT FREE PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN ON TUMOR DETECTION AND TUMOR AGGRESSIVENESS
- 1 June 2004
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 171 (6 Part 1), 2245-2249
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000127731.56103.50
Abstract
Purpose: We evaluated the positive predictive value and cancer detection rate in the prostate specific antigen (PSA) range of 2.0 to 3.9 ng/ml and assessed the value of percent free (F) PSA (FPSA) on tumor detection and tumor aggressiveness in this low PSA range. Materials and Methods: Of 3,623 men who were attending the second round of screening within the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, section Rotterdam 883 had PSA values of 2.0 to 3.9 ng/ml. These men were offered laterally directed sextant biopsy. FPSA was prospectively determined from pretreatment serum. Cancers were classified as prognostically favorable and unfavorable using biopsy results and other pretreatment diagnostic features. Results: Using the PSA range of 2.0 to 3.9 ng/ml as a biopsy indication 126 cancers were detected, resulting in a positive predictive value of 17.1% and a cancer detection rate of 14.3%. By using percent FPSA and setting relative sensitivity at 95% 9% of biopsies could have been avoided. Unfavorable tumor characteristics were found in 46.9% of the men with T1C tumors. Mean percent FPSA was significantly lower in such men compared to men with favorable tumor characteristics. Of the men with percent FPSA lower than 10% 90% had unfavorable tumor characteristics. Conclusions: The PSA range 2.0 to 3.9 ng/ml is accessible for prostate cancer screening. Percent FPSA is of moderate value in avoiding unnecessary biopsies in the PSA range of 2.0 to 3.9 ng/ml. However, when assessing tumor aggressiveness in biopsy results, percent FPSA is predictive and can be used to select treatment options, such as watchful waiting.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of Verification Bias on Screening for Prostate Cancer by Measurement of Prostate-Specific AntigenNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Verification Bias and the Prostate-Specific Antigen Test — Is There a Case for a Lower Threshold for Biopsy?New England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION AT LOW PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGENJournal of Urology, 2000
- Predictors for biopsy outcome in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (Rotterdam Region)The Prostate, 1999
- Prospective Evaluation of Men With Stage T1C Adenocarcinoma of the ProstateJournal of Urology, 1997
- The Free-To-Total Prostate Specific Antigen Ratio Improves the Specificity of Prostate Specific Antigen in Screening for Prostate Cancer in the General PopulationJournal of Urology, 1997
- Analysis of percent free prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for prostate cancer detection: Influence of total psa, prostate volume, and ageUrology, 1996
- The value of screening tests in the detection of prostate cancer. Part I: Results of a retrospective evaluation of 1726 menUrology, 1995
- European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer. Progress report of Antwerp and Rotterdam Pilot studiesCancer, 1995
- Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancerPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1994