13-year follow-up of the German angioplasty bypass surgery investigation
Open Access
- 23 June 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Heart Journal
- Vol. 26 (20), 2148-2153
- https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehi385
Abstract
Aims The German Angioplasty Bypass Surgery Investigation was designed to compare symptomatic efficacy and safety of percutaneous coronary balloon angioplasty (PTCA) with coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) in patients with symptomatic multi-vessel disease. This follow-up study was performed to determine the long-term outcome of patients following these interventions. Methods and results From 1986 to 1991, 359 patients with angina CCS class II–IV, age below 75 years, and coronary multi-vessel disease requiring revascularization of at least two major coronary vessels were recruited at eight German centres and randomized to PTCA or CABG. From 337 patients undergoing the planned procedure, 324 patients could be followed-up (96%). Baseline parameters were identical in both groups, 2.2±0.6 vessels were treated in CABG patients, whereas 1.9±0.5 vessels were treated in PTCA patients. Thirty-seven per cent of surgical patients received internal mammary artery grafts, while no stents were used in patients undergoing PTCA. At the end of the 13-year follow-up period, the degree of angina, the degree of dyspnea, and the utilization of nitrates were comparable in both groups. With a total number of 76 deaths, Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed a comparable distribution in both groups. Although time to first re-intervention was significantly shorter in the PTCA group, Pn=94; PTCA, n=136) and crossover rates (CABG to PTCA, n=49; PTCA to CABG, n=51) were comparable in both groups. Conclusion The results of our 13-year follow-up suggest that in patients with symptomatic multi-vessel disease, both PTCA and CABG are associated with a comparable long-term survival and symptomatic efficacy. How far these results may be altered by developments such as drug-eluting stents or off-pump surgery remains to be determined.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Seven-year outcome in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) by treatment and diabetic statusJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2000
- Long-term results of RITA-1 trial: clinical and cost comparisons of coronary angioplasty and coronary-artery bypass graftingThe Lancet, 1998
- Comparison of Coronary Bypass Surgery with Angioplasty in Patients with Multivessel DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- The Medicine, Angioplasty or Surgery Study (MASS): A prospective, randomized trial of medical therapy, balloon angioplasty or bypass surgery for single proximal left anterior descending artery stenosesJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1995
- First-year results of CABRI (Coronary Angioplasty versus Bypass Revascularisation Investigation)The Lancet, 1995
- A Randomized Trial Comparing Coronary Angioplasty with Coronary Bypass SurgeryNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- A Randomized Study of Coronary Angioplasty Compared with Bypass Surgery in Patients with Symptomatic Multivessel Coronary DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Coronary angioplasty versus left internal mammary artery grafting for isolated proximal left anterior descending artery stenosisThe Lancet, 1994
- Argentine randomized trial of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery in multivessel disease (ERACI): In-hospital results and 1-year follow-upJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1993
- Coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery: the Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) trialThe Lancet, 1993