Evolution in group-structured populations can resolve the tragedy of the commons
- 15 March 2006
- journal article
- Published by The Royal Society in Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
- Vol. 273 (1593), 1477-1481
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3476
Abstract
Public goods are the key features of all human societies and are also important in many animal societies. Collaborative hunting and collective defence are but two examples of public goods that have played a crucial role in the development of human societies and still play an important role in many animal societies. Public goods allow societies composed largely of cooperators to outperform societies composed mainly of non-cooperators. However, public goods also provide an incentive for individuals to be selfish by benefiting from the public good without contributing to it. This is the essential paradox of cooperation-known variously as the Tragedy of the Commons, Multi-person Prisoner's Dilemma or Social Dilemma. Here, we show that a new model for evolution in group-structured populations provides a simple and effective mechanism for the emergence and maintenance of cooperation in such a social dilemma. This model does not depend on kin selection, direct or indirect reciprocity, punishment, optional participation or trait-group selection. Since this mechanism depends only on population dynamics and requires no cognitive abilities on the part of the agents concerned, it potentially applies to organisms at all levels of complexity.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prisoner's dilemma and public goods games in different geometries: Compulsory versus voluntary interactionsComplexity, 2003
- Volunteering as Red Queen Mechanism for Cooperation in Public Goods GamesScience, 2002
- Cooperation and Competition Between RelativesScience, 2002
- Reputation helps solve the ‘tragedy of the commons’Nature, 2002
- Altruistic punishment in humansNature, 2002
- Inclusive fitness in a homogeneous environmentProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 1992
- The benefits of the commonsNature, 1989
- Soft Selection, Hard Selection, Kin Selection, and Group SelectionThe American Naturalist, 1985
- The Evolution of Reciprocal AltruismThe Quarterly Review of Biology, 1971
- The genetical evolution of social behaviour. IJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1964