Psychological consequences for parents of false negative results on prenatal screening for Down's syndrome: retrospective interview study
- 12 February 2000
- Vol. 320 (7232), 407-412
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7232.407
Abstract
Objective: To determine the psychological consequences for parents of children with Down's syndrome of having received a false negative result on prenatal screening. Design: Comparison of adjustment of parents who received a false negative result with that of parents not offered a test and those who declined a test. Setting: Parents were interviewed in their own homes. Participants: Parents of 179 children with Down's syndrome (mean age 4 (range 2-6) years). Main outcome measures: Anxiety, depression, parenting stress, attitudes towards the child, and attributions of blame for the birth of the affected child. Results: Overall, regardless of screening history, parents adjusted well to having a child with Down's syndrome. Compared with mothers who declined a test, mothers in the false negative group had higher parenting stress (mean score 81.2 v 71.8, P=0.016, 95% confidence interval for the difference 1.8to 17.0) and more negative attitudes towards their children (124.9v 134.2, P=0.009, −16.2 to −2.4). Fathers in the false negative group had higher parenting stress test scores (77.8 v 70.0, P=0.046, 1.5 to 14.2) than fathers not offered a test. Mothers in the false negative group were more likely to blame others for the outcome than mothers who had not been offered the test (28% v 13%, P=0.032, 3% to 27%). Mothers and fathers in the false negative group were more likely to blame others for this outcome than parents who had declined a test (mothers 28% v 0%, P=0.001, 19% to 37%; fathers 27% v 0%, P=0.004, 17% to 38%). Blaming others was associated with poorer adjustment for mothers and fathers. Conclusions: A false negative result on prenatal screening seems to have a small adverse effect on parental adjustment evident two to six years after the birth of an affected child.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- UK multicentre project on assessment of risk of trisomy 21 by maternal age and fetal nuchal-translucency thickness at 10–14 weeks of gestationThe Lancet, 1998
- Parents attributions of blame for the birth of a child with down syndrome: A pilot studyPsychology & Health, 1997
- Informed consent to undergo serum screening for Down's syndrome: the gap between policy and practiceBMJ, 1994
- Analysis of national register of Down's syndrome in England and Wales: trends in prenatal diagnosis, 1989-91.BMJ, 1993
- Screening for Down's syndrome.BMJ, 1992
- The development of a six‐item short‐form of the state scale of the Spielberger State—Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1992
- Presenting a routine screening test in antenatal care: Practice observedPublic Health, 1992
- Results of first year (1989) of a national register of Down's syndrome in England and Wales.BMJ, 1991
- Blaming others for threatening events.Psychological Bulletin, 1990
- TOWARDS A TAILORED MEASURE OF PARENTAL ATTITUDES: AN APPROACH TO THE EVALUATION OF ONE ASPECT OF INTERVENTION PROJECTS WITH PARENTS OF HANDICAPPED CHILDRENChild: Care, Health and Development, 1980