Blood transfusion and disease free survival in cervical carcinoma
- 1 January 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 8 (4), 356-359
- https://doi.org/10.3109/01443618809008820
Abstract
The case notes of 201 patients who had had radical hysterectomy and pelvic node dissection, with or without postoperative radiotherapy, for stages 1b or 2a cervical carcinoma, were analysed to determine if those who had not been transfused had a longer disease free survival time. When patients were divided into those who had received a blood transfusion and those who had not, no differences were found in patients'' ages, tumour types or length of follow up. Separate analysis of patients treated with or without radiotherapy found no survival advantage for patients not transfused. Similar analysis of the different histopathological tumour types also found no difference in disease free survival for patients not transfused. These results are in contrast to previously published reports that have shown an improvement in disease free survival in patients not transfused.This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Association between transfusion of whole blood and recurrence of cancer.BMJ, 1986
- Recurrent carcinoma of the vulva: relationship with operative blood transfusionJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1986
- Red for danger: blood transfusion and colorectal cancer.BMJ, 1985
- Relation between recurrence of cancer of the colon and blood transfusion.BMJ, 1985
- Relation between cancer of the colon and blood transfusion.BMJ, 1985
- Relation between cancer of the colon and blood transfusionBMJ, 1985
- Relation between recurrence of cancer of the colon and blood transfusion.BMJ, 1985
- Adverse relationship between blood transfusions and survival after colectomy for colon cancerCancer, 1985
- Blood Transfusions and Survival After Surgery for Breast CancerArchives of Surgery, 1984
- EFFECT OF BLOOD TRANSFUSIONS ON COLONIC MALIGNANCY RECURRENCE RATEThe Lancet, 1982