Rat peritoneal macrophage adhesion to hydroxyethyl methacrylate–ethyl methacrylate copolymers and hydroxystyrene–styrene copolymers
- 1 November 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Biomedical Materials Research
- Vol. 19 (9), 1101-1115
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820190919
Abstract
Macrophage adhesion to a wide variety of substrates has been measured, but no systematic study of the influence of specific substrate chemical properties on adhesion is available. These studies were conducted using two series of materials, copolymers of hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) and ethyl methacrylate (EMA) and copolymers of hydroxystyrene and styrene, to determine the effect of a single chemical property, polar character, on adhesion. Rat periotoneal macrophages were allowed to contact polymer substrates for periods ranging from 1 to 240 min before being subjected to a shear stress of 60–120 dynes/cm2 in a thin‐channel flow cell. Percentage adhesion was calculated from the number of cells that remained adherent to the substrate after 30 s of applied shear stress. Macrophages remained adherent to 100% EMA and all hydroxystyrene–styrene copolymer surfaces after only 1 min of contact. In copolymers of the HEMA‐EMA series, the time required to attain peak adhesion levels increased with increasing substrate hydrophilicity (increasing HEMA content). Cells did not attach to the 20% EMA/80% HEMA copolymer and the 100% HEMA polymer. The results demonstrate that there is a time delay between contact and adhesion of the cells to surfaces of increasing hydrophilicity within the HEMA‐EMA series and no time delay with the hydroxystyrene–styrene series. The time delay is thought to be a function of the excluded volume provided by polymers that are able to undergo significant chain rotation and or swelling in the solvent, water. Small excluded volumes present in copolymers of high EMA content and all hydroxystyrene–styrene copolymers offer little or no resistance to formation of adhesive bonds by macrophages, whereas copolymers with large excluded volumes (high HEMA content) prevent contact and/or adhesion. A mechanism based on the net excluded volumes of both the cell and substrate surface macromolecule is proposed to explain this phenomenon.This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comments on cell adhesion to biomaterial surfaces: Conflicts and concernsJournal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1982
- Adsorption of proteins from plasma to a series of hydrophilic-hydrophobic copolymers. I. Analysis with thein situ radioiodination techniqueJournal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1981
- In vitro expression of spontaneous macrophage cytotoxicity is independent of substratum adhesivenessExperimental Cell Research, 1979
- The rate of adhesion of melanoma cells onto nonionic polymer surfacesJournal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1978
- Membrane transport by macrophages in suspension and adherent to glassJournal of Cellular Physiology, 1977
- Binding of soluble form of fibroblast surface protein, fibronectin, to collagenInternational Journal of Cancer, 1977
- Sulphonated polystyrene as an optimal substratum for the adhesion and spreading of mesenchymal cells in monovalent and divalent saline solutionsJournal of Cellular Physiology, 1977
- Effect of cytochalasin B on the adhesion of mouse peritoneal macrophages.The Journal of cell biology, 1976
- Polymer exclusion, cell adhesion and membrane fusionNature, 1975
- THE ADHESIVENESS OF LEUCOCYTES TO SOLID SURFACESThe Journal of general physiology, 1922