Epitope-specific regulation. I. Carrier-specific induction of suppression for IgG anti-hapten antibody responses
Open Access
- 1 June 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Rockefeller University Press in The Journal of Experimental Medicine
- Vol. 155 (6), 1730-1740
- https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.155.6.1730
Abstract
The epitope-specific regulatory system selectively controls IgG antibody production to the individual (haptenic) determinants on a complex antigen. This system can be specifically induced to suppress primary and secondary IgG antibody responses to dinitrophenyl hapten (DNP) without interfering with antibody responses to epitopes on the carrier molecule on which the DNP is presented. Once induced, it will specifically suppress responses to DNP presented on unrelated carrier molecules. Results were obtained using widely different immunization conditions and a variety of haptens and carrier molecules indicate that this regulatory system controls antibody production in most T-dependent antibody responses. Carrier-specific mouse suppressor T cells (CT) that arise shortly after priming with a carrier molecule such as keyhole limpet hemocyaninin (KLH) induce the epitope-specific system to suppress in situ and adoptive antibody responses to epitopes (e.g., DNP) presented subsequently on the priming carrier. These well-known regulatory T cells are commonly believed to regulate antibody production by interfering with carrier-specific help; by repeating the original CT transfer experiments with additional controls that define the specificity of the mechanism mediating suppression in CTs recipients, KLH-specific CT were shown to regulate responses by inducing typical isotope-specific suppression for anti-DNP responses when the recipients are immunized with DNP-KLH. Thus, whether KLH-primed animals are immunized directly with DNP-KLH (KLH/DNP-KLH immunization sequence) or whether T cells from these animals are challenged with DNP-KLH in (nonirradiated) recipients, anti-DNP responses are persistently suppressed while anti-carrier responses proceed normally. The aqueous KLH-priming protocols usually used to generate CT are marginally more effective in priming for in situ suppression-induction than the alum KLH-priming protocols commonly used to generate KLH-specific helper T cells and used here in KLH/DNP-KLH immunizations. Thus, priming with an antigenic (carrier) molecule simultaneously prepares the animal for the production of typical secondary (anamnestic) antibody responses to epitopes on the priming antigen and for the induction of epitope-specific suppression for antibody production to determinants presented subsequently on the same antigenic molecule. The mechanism(s) responsible for this duality and its significance for antibody responses is discussed.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Epitope-specific regulation. II. A bistable, Igh-restricted regulatory mechanism central to immunologic memoryThe Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1982
- Lack of immune response gene control for induction of epitope-specific suppression by TGAL antigenNature, 1982
- Memory B cells at successive stages of differentiation. Affinity maturation and the role of IgD receptorsThe Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1980
- The Role of Antigen-Specific T Cell Factors in the Immune ResponseAdvances in Immunology, 1980
- Localization of murine Ig-1b and Ig-1a (IgG 2a) allotypic determinants detected with monoclonal antibodiesMolecular Immunology, 1979
- Properties of the antigen-specific suppressive T-cell factor in the regulation of antibody response of the mouse. III. Dual gene control of the T-cell-mediated suppression of the antibody response.The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1976
- Feedback induction of suppressor T-cell activity.The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1975
- THE REQUIREMENT OF MORE THAN ONE ANTIGENIC DETERMINANT FOR IMMUNOGENICITYThe Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1969