Should follow-up of patients with arthroplasties be carried out by general practitioners?
Open Access
- 1 September 2007
- journal article
- Published by British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume
- Vol. 89 (9), 1133-1134
- https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.89b9.19697
Abstract
Due to economic constraints, it has been suggested that joint replacement patients can be followed up in primary care. There are clinical, ethical and academic reasons why we must ensure that our joint replacements are appropriately clinically and radiologically followed up to minimise complications. This Editorial discusses this.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Charnley low-friction arthroplastyThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2007
- The excess mortality due to periprosthetic femur fracture. A study from the Swedish national hip arthroplasty registerBone, 2007
- Predictive value of early radiographic findings in cementless total hip arthroplasty femoral components: An 8- to 12-Year Follow-upThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1998