The double-contrast enema: Myths and misconceptions
- 1 December 1976
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Gastrointestinal Radiology
- Vol. 1 (1), 19-31
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02256338
Abstract
The role of the double-contrast enema (DCE) remains controversial since no controlled comparison between the barium enema (BE) and the DCE has been performed. As a result of our experience with routine use of the DCE, we believe that it is the most sensitive technique for the detection of polypoid, annular, and inflammatory lesions in the colon. There are many commonly held myths and misconceptions regarding the DCE and these are discussed and refuted. The advantages of the DCE over the BE are discussed and illustrated.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Complications of flexible fiberoptic colonoscopy and polypectomyGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1975
- Comparison of colonoscopy and the contrast enema in five hundred patients with colorectal diseaseThe American Journal of Surgery, 1975
- Colonoscopy in the management of colon polypsBritish Journal of Surgery, 1974
- HYPOTONIC BARIUM ENEMA EXAMINATIONAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1972
- The modified Malmö double-contrast barium enema in colitis: an assessment of its accuracy in reflecting sigmoidoscopic findingsThe British Journal of Radiology, 1972
- The radiology of colonic and rectal polypsBritish Journal of Surgery, 1968
- Results of the Malmö Technique of Colon ExaminationPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1967
- The Radiological Diagnosis of Non‐specific Haemorrhagic Proctocolitis (Haemorrhagic Proctitis and Ulcerative Colitis)Acta Medica Scandinavica, 1964
- UNDER THE CHARGE OFThe American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 1963
- The Double Contrast Method in Ulcerative ColitisActa Radiologica, 1961