High- versus low-dose fluconazole therapy for empiric treatment of suspected invasive candidiasis among high-risk patients in the intensive care unit: a cost-effectiveness analysis
- 2 April 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Informa Healthcare in Current Medical Research and Opinion
- Vol. 23 (5), 1057-1065
- https://doi.org/10.1185/030079907x182130
Abstract
Background: High-dose fluconazole is an alternative for patients with candidemia caused by Candida glabrata or other Candida species with decreased fluconazole susceptibility. However, empiric high-dose fluconazole is not currently recommended and may result in higher drug costs and toxicity. Objective: To determine the cost-effectiveness of using empiric high-dose fluconazole in intensive care unit (ICU) with suspected invasive candidiasis. Design: Decision analytic model. Target population: ICU patients with suspected invasive candidiasis. Time horizon: Lifetime. Perspective: Societal. Interventions: Low-dose fluconazole (loading dose of 800 mg followed by 400 mg daily) vs. high-dose fluconazole (loading dose of 1600 mg followed by 800 mg daily). Generic fluconazole costs were used for the analysis. Outcome measures: Incremental life expectancy and incremental cost per discounted life year (DLY) saved. Result of base-case analysis: Based on current national levels of fluconazole resistance and ability to correctly identify patients with candidemia, high-dose fluconazole was the more effective but more expensive treatment strategy. Empiric high-dose fluconazole therapy decreased the mortality rate by 0.15% compared to low-dose strategy with a cost-effectiveness rate of $55 526 per DLY saved. Results of sensitivity analysis: Empirical high-dose fluconazole was an acceptable treatment strategy (using $100 000 per DLY saved as threshold) unless the physical age of an ICU survivor was 66 years or older. Empirical high-dose fluconazole was an acceptable treatment strategy using $50 000 per DLY saved with minor changes in parameters estimates. Limitations: The estimates of our model may not be applicable to all ICU patients. Other hospitals with differences in fluconazole resistance, prevalence of invasive candidiasis, or duration of fluconazole therapy may produce different results. Conclusion: These results suggest that empiric high-dose fluconazole therapy should reduce the mortality associated with invasive candidiasis at an acceptable cost.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Time to Initiation of Fluconazole Therapy Impacts Mortality in Patients with Candidemia: A Multi‐Institutional StudyClinical Infectious Diseases, 2006
- Evaluation of antifungals in the surgical intensive care unit: a multi‐institutional studyMycoses, 2006
- Interpretive Breakpoints for Fluconazole and Candida Revisited: a Blueprint for the Future of Antifungal Susceptibility TestingClinical Microbiology Reviews, 2006
- The Hepatotoxicity of Antifungal Medications in Bone Marrow Transplant RecipientsClinical Infectious Diseases, 2005
- Guidelines for Treatment of CandidiasisClinical Infectious Diseases, 2004
- A Randomized and Blinded Multicenter Trial of High‐Dose Fluconazole plus Placebo versus Fluconazole plus Amphotericin B as Therapy for Candidemia and Its Consequences in Nonneutropenic SubjectsClinical Infectious Diseases, 2003
- Economic Analysis of Fluconazole versus Amphotericin B for the Treatment of Candidemia in Non-Neutropenic PatientsPharmacoEconomics, 1998
- Multicenter randomized trial of fluconazole versus amphotericin B for treatment of candidemia in non-neutropenic patientsEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1997
- A randomized study comparing fluconazole with amphotericin B/5-flucytosine for the treatment of systemicCandida infections in intensive care patientsInfection, 1996
- Dose-dependent fluconazole hepatotoxicity proven on biopsy and rechallengeJournal of Infection, 1992