Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 7 June 2007
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Trials
- Vol. 8 (1), 16
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-8-16
Abstract
In systematic reviews and meta-analyses, time-to-event outcomes are most appropriately analysed using hazard ratios (HRs). In the absence of individual patient data (IPD), methods are available to obtain HRs and/or associated statistics by carefully manipulating published or other summary data. Awareness and adoption of these methods is somewhat limited, perhaps because they are published in the statistical literature using statistical notation.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysisInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2004
- Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized TrialsJAMA, 2004
- Aggregate data meta‐analysis with time‐to‐event outcomesStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- The Value of the Aggregate Data Approach in Meta-Analysis with Time-to-Event OutcomesJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 2001
- Blinding and exclusions after allocation in randomised controlled trials: survey of published parallel group trials in obstetrics and gynaecologyBMJ, 1996
- Factors Influencing Publication of Research ResultsJAMA, 1992
- Publication bias in clinical researchThe Lancet, 1991
- The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its OccurrenceJAMA, 1990
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986
- Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: An overview of the randomized trialsProgress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 1985