Statistical Models in Morphometrics: Are They Realistic?
- 1 March 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Systematic Zoology
- Vol. 39 (1), 60-69
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2992208
Abstract
This analysis considers the validity of the assumptions of the Gaussian perturbation model as applied to landmark data collected for morphometric analyses. The primary conclusion is that the assumption of homoscedasticity is unrealistic when applied to biological data sets. We also point out some important difficulties associated with alternate models.This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Three‐dimensional measurement accuracy of skull surface landmarksAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1988
- Size and Shape Spaces for Landmark Data in Two DimensionsStatistical Science, 1986
- A statistical method for biological shape comparisonsJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1984