Reviewer Bias
- 1 June 1992
- journal article
- Published by American College of Physicians in Annals of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 116 (11), 958
- https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-116-11-958_2
Abstract
To the Editors: Several forms of publication bias distort the medical literature (1). To test the hypothesis that "reviewer bias" exists, a MEDLINE search of publications on transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) between 1983 and 1990 was carried out to identify investigators who had reported original data on this subject. Thirty-three investigators whose data were either clearly for or against the clinical effectiveness of TENS were selected. Investigators whose studies produced inconclusive results were excluded. The selected investigators were sent a fictitious "research paper" on TENS. It deliberately included strong points and flaws but reported a "positive" result. The manuscriptKeywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Publication BiasJAMA, 1992
- Pride and prejudice in peer reviewJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1991
- Construction, consent, and condemnation in research on peer reviewJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1991