Housing Attributes and Serious Mental Illness: Implications for Research and Practice
- 1 October 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychiatric Association Publishing in Psychiatric Services
- Vol. 52 (10), 1309-1317
- https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.52.10.1309
Abstract
This paper critically reviews studies of the relationship between housing attributes and serious mental illness, highlights important gaps in the research, generates hypotheses to be tested, and suggests a research agenda. Studies published between 1975 and March 2000 were identified through computerized searches, previous literature reviews, and consultation with mental health and housing researchers. Criteria for inclusion included the presentation of quantitative evidence, a systematic sample of known generalizability, and systematic analytic techniques. The 32 studies that met these criteria relied on one or more of three conceptualizations of the role of housing: housing attributes or assessments as an outcome or dependent variable; housing attributes as inputs or independent variables in a model in which the outcome pertains to a nonhousing factor, such as a mental health outcome; or housing as both an input and an outcome. Three studies found no long-term effect of improved housing adequacy on housing satisfaction above and beyond case management. Three studies found better outcomes for settings that have fewer occupants. Another study suggested that persons who live in small-scale, good-quality, noninstitutional environments are less likely to engage in disruptive behavior when a larger proportion of other tenants also have serious mental illness. The strongest finding from the literature on housing as an input and an outcome was that living in independent housing was associated with greater satisfaction with housing and neighborhood. Most of the studies had methodological weaknesses, and few addressed key hypotheses. There is a critical need for a coherent agenda built around key hypotheses and for a uniform set of measures of housing an input and an outcome.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Longitudinal assessment of family support among homeless mentally ill participants in a supported housing programJournal of Community Psychology, 1998
- A Randomized Trial of Assertive Community Treatment for Homeless Persons With Severe Mental IllnessArchives of General Psychiatry, 1997
- Housing costs for adults who are mentally ill and formerly homelessJournal of Mental Health Administration, 1997
- Providing independent housing for the homeless mentally ill: A novel approach to evaluating long‐term longitudinal housing patternsJournal of Community Psychology, 1996
- Quality of life in alternative residential settingsPsychiatric Quarterly, 1991
- Housing environments and community adjustment of severely mentally ill personsCommunity Mental Health Journal, 1990
- The relationship between long‐term psychiatric clients' psychological well‐being and their perceptions of housing and social supportAmerican Journal of Community Psychology, 1988
- Person-environment congruence and psychiatric patient outcome in community care homesAdministration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 1984
- Foster Home Characteristics and Psychiatric Patient OutcomeArchives of General Psychiatry, 1980
- Census tract predictors and the social integration of sheltered care residentsSocial psychiatry. Sozialpsychiatrie. Psychiatrie sociale, 1976