Evidence for neural inhibition in bittersweet taste mixtures.
- 1 January 1979
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology
- Vol. 93 (3), 538-547
- https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077582
Abstract
Lines (3) of evidence from psychophysical experiments implied that mutual suppression of bitter and sweet tastes is due to neural inhibition rather than chemical interactions in solution or competition of molecules for common receptors sites. Removal of sweetness from bittersweet mixtures caused the bitterness to increase. This was accomplished by adaptation to sucrose or by treatment with Gymnema sylvestre, neither of which affect the concentration of sucrose on the tongue. Increases in the bitterness of mixtures, independent of the concentration of the sweet masking substance, are difficult to reconcile with suppression by means of chemical interactions. Similar dependence of suppression on perceived intensity (and independence from concentration) was observed with mixtures of phenylthiocarbamide and sucrose. Tasters (human) of phenylthiocarbamide showed stronger suppression of sweetness than nontasters. This was inconsistent with molecular interactions causing suppression, which would have resulted in the same degree of suppression for the 2 groups. Findings support neural explanations of mixture suppression, e.g., antidromic inhibition or occlusion.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Gustatory perception of sour, sweet, and salt mixtures using parotid gland flow rateJournal of Applied Physiology, 1965
- Gustatory adaptation to saliva and sodium chloride.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963
- Thalamic localization of afferents from the tongue in squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus)Journal of Comparative Neurology, 1962
- THE MEASUREMENT OF TASTE SENSITIVITY TO PHENYLTHIOUREA (P.T.C.)Annals of Eugenics, 1949
- The Relationship between Chemical Constitution and TasteProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1932