Use of risk reclassification with multiple biomarkers improves mortality prediction in acute lung injury
- 1 April 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 39 (4), 711-717
- https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0b013e318207ec3c
Abstract
Objective: Multiple single biomarkers have been associated with poor outcomes in acute lung injury; however, no single biomarker has sufficient discriminating power to clearly indicate prognosis. Using both derivation and replication cohorts, we tested novel risk reclassification methods to determine whether measurement of multiple plasma biomarkers at the time of acute lung injury diagnosis would improve mortality prediction in acute lung injury. Design: Analysis of plasma biomarker levels and prospectively collected clinical data from patients enrolled in two randomized controlled trials of ventilator therapy for acute lung injury. Setting: Intensive care units of university hospitals participating in the National Institutes of Health Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. Patients: Subjects enrolled in a trial of lower tidal volume ventilation (derivation cohort) and subjects enrolled in a trial of higher vs. lower positive end-expiratory pressure (replication cohort). Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: The plasma biomarkers were intercellular adhesion molecule-1, von Willebrand factor, interleukin-8, soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor-1, and surfactant protein-D. In the derivation cohort (n = 547), adding data on these biomarkers to clinical predictors (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score) at the time of study enrollment improved the accuracy of risk prediction, as reflected by a net reclassification improvement of 22% (95% confidence interval 13% to 32%; p < .001). In the replication cohort (n = 500), the net reclassification improvement was 17% (95% confidence interval 7% to 26%; p < .001). A reduced set of three biomarkers (interleukin-8, soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor-1, and surfactant protein-D) had nearly equivalent prognostic value in both cohorts. Conclusions: When combined with clinical data, plasma biomarkers measured at the onset of acute lung injury can improve the accuracy of risk prediction. Combining three or more biomarkers may be useful for selecting a high-risk acute lung injury population for enrollment in clinical trials of novel therapies.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Recent trends in acute lung injury mortality: 1996–2005*Critical Care Medicine, 2009
- Soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and clinical outcomes in patients with acute lung injuryIntensive Care Medicine, 2008
- Variation in ICU Risk-Adjusted MortalityChest, 2008
- Plasma receptor for advanced glycation end products and clinical outcomes in acute lung injuryThorax, 2008
- Use of Multiple Biomarkers to Improve the Prediction of Death from Cardiovascular CausesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Predictors of hospital mortality in a population-based cohort of patients with acute lung injury*Critical Care Medicine, 2008
- Technology Insight: biomarker development in acute kidney injury—what can we anticipate?Nature Clinical Practice Nephrology, 2008
- Trauma-associated lung injury differs clinically and biologically from acute lung injury due to other clinical disorders*Critical Care Medicine, 2007
- Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: From area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyondStatistics in Medicine, 2007
- From evidence to clinical practice: Effective implementation of therapeutic hypothermia to improve patient outcome after cardiac arrest*Critical Care Medicine, 2006