The dearth of new antibiotic development: why we should be worried and what we can do about it
- 15 November 2004
- journal article
- for debate
- Published by Wiley in The Medical Journal of Australia
- Vol. 181 (10), 549-553
- https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2004.tb06444.x
Abstract
The emergence and spread of multidrug‐resistant pathogens has increased substantially over the past 20 years. Over the same period, the development of new antibiotics has decreased alarmingly, with many pharmaceutical companies pulling out of antibiotic research in favour of developing “lifestyle” drugs. Reasons given for withdrawing from antibiotic development include poor “net present value” status of antibiotics, changes in regulations requiring larger drug trials and prolonged post‐marketing surveillance, clinical preference for narrow‐spectrum rather than broad‐spectrum agents, and high new‐drug purchase costs. Major improvements in infection control in Australia are needed to prevent further spread of resistant clones, buying some time to develop urgently needed new antibiotic agents. Perpetuating a culture of “pharma bashing” will simply lead to more pharmaceutical companies withdrawing from the market. A change in the health and research culture is needed to improve cooperation between public, academic and private sectors.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Continuous and 4 h infusion of amphotericin B: a comparative study involving high-risk haematology patientsJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2004
- Daptomycin: Another Novel Agent for Treating Infections Due to Drug‐Resistant Gram‐Positive PathogensClinical Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Stability of benzylpenicillin during continuous home intravenous therapyJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2004
- Antimicrobial Resistance inStaphylococcus aureusin Australian Teaching Hospitals, 1989-1999Microbial Drug Resistance, 2003
- Effective Suppression of Vancomycin‐ResistantEnterococcusSpecies in Asymptomatic Gastrointestinal Carriers by a Novel Glycolipodepsipeptide, RamoplaninClinical Infectious Diseases, 2001
- Comparison of effects of amphotericin B deoxycholate infused over 4 or 24 hours: randomised controlledBMJ, 2001
- Handwashing—the Semmelweis lesson forgotten?The Lancet, 1994
- Fleming's DiscoveryClinical Infectious Diseases, 1980
- Lactam Antibiotics and Lactamases: Two Sides of a Continuing StoryClinical Infectious Diseases, 1979
- PENICILLIN AS A CHEMOTHERAPEUTIC AGENTThe Lancet, 1940