On perceptual readiness.
- 1 January 1957
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Psychological Review
- Vol. 64 (2), 123-152
- https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043805
Abstract
Readiness depends on how accessible categories are to the stimulated organism. Accessibility is a function of the likehood of occurrence of previously learned events, and one''s need states and habits of daily living. Lack of perceptual readiness can be rectified by relearning the categories, or by constant close inspection of events and objects. Sensory stimuli are "sorted" to appropriate categories by searching for and using cues. 4 mechanisms are proposed: "grouping and integration, access ordering, match-mismatch signal utilization, and gating." Failure of perceptual readiness may occur because of inability to learn appropriate categories or through interference of accessible categories. These ideas may shed light on "perceptual defense." 88 references.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- How to Make Our Ideas ClearPublished by JSTOR ,2011
- Perceptual Identification and Perceptual OrganizationThe Journal of General Psychology, 1955
- Discriminative skill and discriminative matching in perceptual recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1955
- On the interpretation of word frequency as a variable affecting speed of recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1954
- A decision-making theory of visual detection.Psychological Review, 1954
- Perception of the statistical structure of a random series of binary symbols.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1953
- The personal world through perception.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1951
- Personality dynamics and the process of perceiving.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1951
- The intelligibility of speech as a function of the context of the test materials.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1951
- Autonomic discrimination without awareness: a study of subception.Psychological Review, 1951