The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration
Top Cited Papers
- 7 January 2003
- journal article
- guideline
- Published by American College of Physicians in Annals of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 138 (1), W1-12
- https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-138-1-200301070-00012-w1
Abstract
The quality of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy is less than optimal. Complete and accurate reporting is necessary to enable readers to assess the potential for bias in the study and to evaluate the generalizability of the results. A group of scientists and editors has developed the STARD (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy) statement to improve the reporting the quality of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy. The statement consists of a checklist of 25 items and flow diagram that authors can use to ensure that all relevant information is present. This explanatory document aims to facilitate the use, understanding, and dissemination of the checklist. The document contains a clarification of the meaning, rationale, and optimal use of each item on the checklist, as well as a short summary of the available evidence on bias and applicability. The STARD statement, checklist, flowchart, and this explanation and elaboration document should be useful resources to improve reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies. Complete and informative reporting can only lead to better decisions in health care.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Coronary Magnetic Resonance Angiography for the Detection of Coronary StenosesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Colorectal Neoplasia: Performance Characteristics of CT Colonography for Detection in 300 PatientsRadiology, 2001
- Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic TestsJAMA, 1999
- Evaluating Bias and Variability in Diagnostic Test ReportsAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1999
- Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviewsBMJ, 1994
- Developing Optimal Search Strategies for Detecting Clinically Sound Studies in MEDLINEJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1994
- Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working GroupJAMA, 1994
- Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working GroupPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1994
- Biases in the assessment of diagnostic testsStatistics in Medicine, 1987
- Methodologic problems of exercise testing for coronary artery disease: Groups, analysis and biasThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1980