Explaining Dog Wolf Differences in Utilizing Human Pointing Gestures: Selection for Synergistic Shifts in the Development of Some Social Skills
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 28 August 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 4 (8), e6584
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006584
Abstract
The comparison of human related communication skills of socialized canids may help to understand the evolution and the epigenesis of gesture comprehension in humans. To reconcile previously contradicting views on the origin of dogs' outstanding performance in utilizing human gestures, we suggest that dog-wolf differences should be studied in a more complex way. We present data both on the performance and the behaviour of dogs and wolves of different ages in a two-way object choice test. Characteristic behavioural differences showed that for wolves it took longer to establish eye contact with the pointing experimenter, they struggled more with the handler, and pups also bit her more before focusing on the human's signal. The performance of similarly hand-reared 8-week-old dogs and wolves did not differ in utilizing the simpler proximal momentary pointing. However, when tested with the distal momentary pointing, 4-month-old pet dogs outperformed the same aged hand reared wolves. Thus early and intensive socialisation does not diminish differences between young dogs and wolves in behaviour and performance. Socialised adult wolves performed similarly well as dogs in this task without pretraining. The success of adult wolves was accompanied with increased willingness to cooperate. Thus, we provide evidence for the first time that socialised adult wolves are as successful in relying on distal momentary pointing as adult pet dogs. However, the delayed emergence of utilising human distal momentary pointing in wolves shows that these wild canines react to a lesser degree to intensive socialisation in contrast to dogs, which are able to control agonistic behaviours and inhibition of actions in a food related task early in development. We suggest a “synergistic” hypothesis, claiming that positive feedback processes (both evolutionary and epigenetic) have increased the readiness of dogs to attend to humans, providing the basis for dog-human communication.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparative approach to dogs’ (Canis familiaris) and human infants’ comprehension of various forms of pointing gesturesAnimal Cognition, 2009
- The effect of development and individual differences in pointing comprehension of dogsAnimal Cognition, 2009
- Effects of selection for cooperation and attention in dogsBehavioral and Brain Functions, 2009
- Wolves outperform dogs in following human social cuesAnimal Behaviour, 2008
- The early ontogeny of human–dog communicationAnimal Behaviour, 2008
- Human-like social skills in dogs?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2005
- Species-specific differences and similarities in the behavior of hand-raised dog and wolf pups in social situations with humansDevelopmental Psychobiology, 2005
- Comparative social cognition: what can dogs teach us?Animal Behaviour, 2004
- A Simple Reason for a Big DifferenceCurrent Biology, 2003
- The Domestication of Social Cognition in DogsScience, 2002