Long-term Risk of Cardiovascular Events With Rosiglitazone
Top Cited Papers
- 12 September 2007
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 298 (10), 1189-1195
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.298.10.1189
Abstract
ContextRecent reports of serious adverse events with rosiglitazone use have raised questions about whether the evidence of harm justifies its use for treatment of type 2 diabetes.ObjectiveTo systematically review the long-term cardiovascular risks of rosiglitazone, including myocardial infarction, heart failure, and cardiovascular mortality.Data SourcesWe searched MEDLINE, the GlaxoSmithKline clinical trials register, the US Food and Drug Administration Web site, and product information sheets for randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses published in English through May 2007.Study SelectionStudies were selected for inclusion if they were randomized controlled trials of rosiglitazone for prevention or treatment of type 2 diabetes, had at least 12 months of follow-up, and monitored cardiovascular adverse events and provided numerical data on all adverse events. Four studies were included after detailed screening of 140 trials for cardiovascular events.Data ExtractionRelative risks (RRs) of myocardial infarction, heart failure, and cardiovascular mortality were estimated using a fixed-effects meta-analysis of 4 randomized controlled trials (n = 14 291, including 6421 receiving rosiglitazone and 7870 receiving control therapy, with a duration of follow-up of 1-4 years).ResultsRosiglitazone significantly increased the risk of myocardial infarction (n = 94/6421 vs 83/7870; RR, 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.91; P = .02) and heart failure (n = 102/6421 vs 62/7870; RR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.52-2.88; P < .001) without a significant increase in risk of cardiovascular mortality (n = 59/6421 vs 72/7870; RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.63-1.26; P = .53). There was no evidence of substantial heterogeneity among the trials for these end points (I2 = 0% for myocardial infarction, 18% for heart failure, and 0% for cardiovascular mortality).ConclusionAmong patients with impaired glucose tolerance or type 2 diabetes, rosiglitazone use for at least 12 months is associated with a significantly increased risk of myocardial infarction and heart failure, without a significantly increased risk of cardiovascular mortality.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pioglitazone and Rosiglitazone Have Different Effects on Serum Lipoprotein Particle Concentrations and Sizes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and DyslipidemiaDiabetes Care, 2007
- Thiazolidinediones and Heart FailureDiabetes Care, 2007
- Rosiglitazone Evaluated for Cardiovascular Outcomes — An Interim AnalysisNew England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Effect of Rosiglitazone on the Risk of Myocardial Infarction and Death from Cardiovascular CausesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial Assessing the Effects of Rosiglitazone on Echocardiographic Function and Cardiac Status in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With New York Heart Association Functional Class I or II Heart FailureJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2007
- Effect of rosiglitazone on the frequency of diabetes in patients with impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting glucose: a randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2006
- Rosiglitazone for type 2 diabetes mellitusPublished by Wiley ,2006
- Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Thiazolidinediones on Serum C-Reactive Protein LevelsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2006
- Cardiovascular Events in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Adults With or Without History of Myocardial InfarctionCirculation, 2004
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003