Random sampling or geostatistical modelling? Choosing between design-based and model-based sampling strategies for soil (with discussion)
- 1 October 1997
- Vol. 80 (1-2), 1-44
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-7061(97)00072-4
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- The performance of spatial interpolation methods and choropleth maps to estimate properties at points: A soil survey case studyEnvironmetrics, 1996
- Application of disjunctive cokriging to compare fertilizer scenarios on a field scaleGeoderma, 1994
- Variability of variograms and spatial estimates due to soil sampling: a case studyGeoderma, 1994
- A structured approach to designing soil survey schemes with prediction of sampling error from variogramsGeoderma, 1994
- Strategies for updating soil survey information: a case study to estimate phosphate sorption characteristicsEuropean Journal of Soil Science, 1992
- The Empirical Efficiency and Validity of Two Neighbour ModelsPublished by JSTOR ,1991
- Geostatistics in Physical Geography. Part I: TheoryTransactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 1989
- Fitting variogram models by weighted least squaresMathematical Geology, 1985
- Robustness of variograms and conditioning of kriging matricesMathematical Geology, 1984
- Accuracy of spatial interpolation between point data on soil moisture supply capacity, compared with estimates from mapping unitsGeoderma, 1982