Using Standardized Serum Creatinine Values in the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Equation for Estimating Glomerular Filtration Rate
Top Cited Papers
- 15 August 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American College of Physicians in Annals of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 145 (4), 247-254
- https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-145-4-200608150-00004
Abstract
Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimates facilitate detection of chronic kidney disease but require calibration of the serum creatinine assay to the laboratory that developed the equation. The 4-variable equation from the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study has been reexpressed for use with a standardized assay. To describe the performance of the revised 4-variable MDRD Study equation and compare it with the performance of the 6-variable MDRD Study and Cockcroft–Gault equations. Comparison of estimated and measured GFR. 15 clinical centers participating in a randomized, controlled trial. 1628 patients with chronic kidney disease participating in the MDRD Study. Serum creatinine levels were calibrated to an assay traceable to isotope-dilution mass spectrometry. Glomerular filtration rate was measured as urinary clearance of 125I-iothalamate. Mean measured GFR was 39.8 mL/min per 1.73 m2 (SD, 21.2). Accuracy and precision of the revised 4-variable equation were similar to those of the original 6-variable equation and better than in the Cockcroft–Gault equation, even when the latter was corrected for bias, with 90%, 91%, 60%, and 83% of estimates within 30% of measured GFR, respectively. Differences between measured and estimated GFR were greater for all equations when the estimated GFR was 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 or greater. The MDRD Study included few patients with a GFR greater than 90 mL/min per 1.73 m2. Equations were not compared in a separate study sample. The 4-variable MDRD Study equation provides reasonably accurate GFR estimates in patients with chronic kidney disease and a measured GFR of less than 90 mL/min per 1.73 m2. By using the reexpressed MDRD Study equation with the standardized serum creatinine assay, clinical laboratories can report more accurate GFR estimates. *For a list of investigators of the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration, see the Appendix.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Kidney function estimating equations: where do we stand?Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension, 2006
- Association of Achieved Dialysis Dose with Mortality in the Hemodialysis StudyJournal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2005
- Estimation of Renal Function in Subjects With Normal Serum Creatinine Levels: Influence of Age and Body Mass IndexAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2005
- Relationship of gender, age, and body mass index to errors in predicted kidney functionNephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 2005
- Definition and classification of chronic kidney disease: A position statement from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO)Kidney International, 2005
- A cystatin C‐based formula without anthropometric variables estimates glomerular filtration rate better than creatinine clearance using the Cockcroft‐Gault formulaScandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 2005
- Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate in Diabetic SubjectsDiabetes Care, 2005
- Predictive Performance of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and Cockcroft-Gault Equations for Estimating Renal FunctionJournal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2005
- Chronic Kidney Disease Awareness, Prevalence, and Trends among U.S. Adults, 1999 to 2000Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2005
- Prediction of Creatinine Clearance from Serum CreatinineNephron, 1976