On the methodology of ISEW, GPI and related measures: some constructive suggestions and some doubt on the ‘threshold’ hypothesis
- 21 August 2000
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Ecological Economics
- Vol. 34 (3), 347-361
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-8009(00)00192-0
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The genuine progress indicator methodological developments and results from AustraliaEcological Economics, 1999
- An index of sustainable economic welfare (ISEW) for ChileEcological Economics, 1999
- Has Australia surpassed its optimal macroeconomic scale? Finding out with the aid of `benefit' and `cost' accounts and a sustainable net benefit indexEcological Economics, 1999
- Should we pursue measurement of the natural capital stock?Ecological Economics, 1998
- The Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW) for ItalySSRN Electronic Journal, 1998
- Sustainable energy for tomorrow's world: The case for an optimistic view of the futureEnergy Policy, 1996
- Economic growth and quality of life: a threshold hypothesisEcological Economics, 1995
- Constant Consumption Paths In Open Economies With Exhaustible ResourcesReview of International Economics, 1995
- An Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare for Scotland, 1980-1991International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 1994
- On the measurement of inequalityJournal of Economic Theory, 1970