The Accordion Severity Grading System of Surgical Complications
Top Cited Papers
- 1 August 2009
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 250 (2), 177-186
- https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181afde41
Abstract
A severity grading system is essential to reporting surgical complications. In 1992, we presented such a system (T92). Its use and that of systems derived from it have increased exponentially. Our purpose was to determine how well T92 and its modifications have functioned as a severity grading system and to develop an improved system for reporting complications. 129 articles were studied in detail. Twenty variables were searched for in each article with particular emphasis on type of study, substitution of qualitative terms for grades, grade compression, and cut-points if grade compression was used. We also determined relative distribution of complications and manner of presentation of complications. T92 and derivative classifications have received wide use in surgical studies ranging from small studies with few complications to large studies of complex operations that describe many complications. There is a strong tendency to contract classifications and to substitute terms with self evident meaning for the numerical grades. Complications are presented in a large variety of tabular forms some of which are much easier to follow than others. Current methods for reporting the severity of complications incompletely fulfill the needs of authors of surgical studies. A new system-the Accordion Severity Grading System-is presented. The Accordion system can be used more readily for small as well as large studies. It introduces standard definition of simple quantitative terms and presents a standard tabular reporting system. This system should bring the field closer to a common severity grading method for surgical complications.Keywords
This publication has 130 references indexed in Scilit:
- Randomized clinical trial assessing the effect of Doppler-optimized fluid management on outcome after elective colorectal resectionBritish Journal of Surgery, 2006
- Central Pancreatectomy RevisitedJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2006
- Caudate hepatectomy for cancer: A single institution experience with 150 patientsJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2005
- Ten-year experience with laparoscopy on a gynecologic oncology service: Analysis of risk factors for complications and conversion to laparotomyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2004
- Does a special interest in laparoscopy affect the treatment of acute cholecystitis?Surgical Endoscopy, 2002
- Gallstone cholangitisSurgical Endoscopy, 2002
- Laparoscopic Pancreatic Resection: Single-Institution Experience of 19 PatientsJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2001
- Outcomes analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the extremely elderlySurgical Endoscopy, 2001
- Is laparoscopic antireflux surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease in the elderly safe and effective?Surgical Endoscopy, 1999
- A new system for defining endoscopic complications emphasizing the measure of importanceGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1997