Nuclear Power Reactors: A Study in Technological Lock-in
- 1 September 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Journal of Economic History
- Vol. 50 (3), 541-567
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022050700037153
Abstract
Recent theory has predicted that if competing technologies operate under dynamic increasing returns, one, possibly inferior, technology will dominate the market. The history of nuclear power technology is used to illustrate these results. Light water is considered inferior to other technologies, yet it dominates the market for power reactors. This is largely due to the early adoption and heavy development by the U.S. Navy of light water for submarine propulsion. When a market for civilian power emerged, light water had a large head start, and by the time other technologies were ready to enter the market, light water was entrenched.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical EventsThe Economic Journal, 1989
- The economics of gateway technologies and network evolution: Lessons from electricity supply historyInformation Economics and Policy, 1988
- Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network ExternalitiesJournal of Political Economy, 1986
- Adoption of Competing Inventions by United States Steel ProducersThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1986
- AGR v PWR The debate continuesEnergy Policy, 1986
- Standardization, Compatibility, and InnovationThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1985
- Learning Effects and the Commercialization of New Energy Technologies: The Case of Nuclear PowerThe Bell Journal of Economics, 1982
- The Effects of Learning by Doing on Nuclear Plant Operating ReliabilityThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1979
- Power ReactorsScientific American, 1954
- ReactorsScientific American, 1951