What is the best evidence for determining harms of medical treatment?
Open Access
- 28 February 2006
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by CMA Impact Inc. in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
- Vol. 174 (5), 645-646
- https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.051484
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of evidence on harms of medical interventions in randomized and nonrandomized studiesCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2006
- The road to health careBMJ, 2004
- Conjugated Equine Estrogens and Incidence of Probable Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment in Postmenopausal WomenWomen's Health Initiative Memory StudyJAMA, 2004
- When are observational studies as credible as randomised trials?The Lancet, 2004
- A comparison of three different sources of data in assessing the frequencies of adverse reactions to amiodaroneBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2004
- Assessing the quality of researchBMJ, 2004
- Effects of Rofecoxib or Naproxen vs Placebo on Alzheimer Disease ProgressionJAMA, 2003
- Research pointers: Mortality from cardiovascular disease more than 10 years after radiotherapy for breast cancer: nationwide cohort study of 90 000 Swedish womenBMJ, 2003
- Pravastatin in elderly individuals at risk of vascular disease (PROSPER): a randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2002
- Improving Safety Reporting from Randomised TrialsDrug Safety, 2002