Corticothalamic projections from postcruciate area 4 in the dog

Abstract
Corticothalamic projections from postcruciate area 4, located on the rostral part of the posterior sigmoid gyms, were traced with the autora‐diographic technique in the dog. Injections of tritiated amino acids were made into the lateral and medial parts of area 4 in regions corresponding to the forelimb and hindlimb areas of the primary motor cortex, respectively. In cases with injections placed in the lateral part of areas, dense accu‐mulations of label were present in the lateral part of the ventral anterior nucleus (VA), the central part of the ventral lateral nucleus (VL), the ventral half of the ventral posterior inferior nucleus (VPI), the caudal part of the central lateral nucleus (CL), and the centrum medianum (CM). Lighter label was also present in the lateral part of the cytoarchitectonically distinct VL region bordering the ventrobasal complex (VB), as well as in the ventro‐lateral part of the mediodorsal nucleus (MD), and in the lateral posterior nucleus (LP). In one case in which the injection site involved an adjacent part of area 3a, label was also seen ventrally in the medial division of the posterior nuclear group (POm). However, no detectable differences in VL, MD, or intralaminar labeling patterns were noted between this case and the four other cases with injections confined to the lateral part of area 4. In two cases with injections restricted to the medial part of area 4, dense label was present in the lateralmost part of VL, the ventral part of VPI, the caudal part of CL, and CM. Lighter label was also present in the VL region bordering the dorsolateral edge of VB and in LP. An additional case in which the injection also involved the rostral border of area 3a showed a similar pattern cf thalamic labeling. Projections from both the lateral and medial parts of area 4 were also noted in the subthalamic nucleus, zona incerta, and nucleus of Darkschewitsch. These results suggest that Corticothalamic projections from postcruciate area 4 to VL are organized topographically such that projections from the lateral part of area 4 project centrally within VL while those from the medial part of area 4 project more laterally. Both parts of area 4 also project top‐ographically to a cytoarchitectonically distinct region of VL located im‐mediately adjacent to VB, In contrast, the projections to the intralaminar nuclei do not appear to be topographically organized. The data from cases involving spread of the injection into area 3a suggest that projection pat‐terns from area 3a to ventral, intralaminar, and medial thalamic nuclei are similar to those from area 4. However, it appears that at least the lateral part of area 3a also projects to POm.