Fate control and leisure attitudes
- 1 January 1979
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Leisure Sciences
- Vol. 2 (3-4), 239-248
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01490407909512918
Abstract
It has been suggested that attitudes toward leisure may be affected by one's perception of the ability to control life's consequences. Rotter's I‐E scale was used in the present study to measure the perceived locus of control and was correlated with the scales of Neulingers Leisure Attitude Inventory. Results indicated that positive attitudes toward leisure were generally more associated with an external than an internal locus of control, i.e., with the perception that one's fate is to a large degree personally uncontrollable. These results are explained in terms of the confounding influence of work/achievement orientation in the measurement of and in the relationship of those variables. Implications for leisure counseling, leisure education, and therapeutic recreation are also discussed.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological Review, 1977
- On the Theoretical Link between Personality and LeisurePsychological Reports, 1976
- Activism and Powerful Others: Distinctions within the Concept of Internal-External ControlJournal of Personality Assessment, 1974
- The multidimensionality of locus of controlJournal of Clinical Psychology, 1973
- Youths' outlook on the future: A past-present comparisonJournal of Youth and Adolescence, 1972
- The Protestant Ethic as a personality variable.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1971
- Dimensions of internal versus external control.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1970
- Internal‐External Control in the Motivational Dynamics of Negro Youth*Journal of Social Issues, 1969
- Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 1966
- Alienation and Learning in a Hospital SettingAmerican Sociological Review, 1962