Place of Care in Advanced Cancer: A Qualitative Systematic Literature Review of Patient Preferences
Top Cited Papers
- 1 September 2000
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in Journal of Palliative Medicine
- Vol. 3 (3), 287-300
- https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2000.3.287
Abstract
Background: It is commonly written that more patients wish to die at home than currently achieve this. However, the evidence for preferences for place of terminal care and death has not been systematically reviewed. Aim: To carry out a systematic literature review of the preferences for place of care and death among advanced cancer patients. Method: Studies were identified using systematic database searches of MEDLINE (1966-1999), PsychLit (1974-1999), and Bath Information Data Service (BIDS) (1981-1999). Studies were assessed and data extracted and synthesises following the NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination guidelines, grading studies according to design and rigor of methods. Studies of preferences in the general population and of groups including cancer patients and/or their caregivers were included. Results: Eighteen studies determining preferences in either the general population or groups including cancer patients were identified. Views were obtained prospectively and retrospectively from patients, the general population, families, and professionals. Respondents indicated preferences for home death (range 49%-100%), except one study of patients in the care of a continuing care team in London where only 25%-29% of patients wanted a home death, and inpatient hospice was the most favored option. However, the response rate of this study was not known. Among the general public there was a higher preference for inpatient hospice care among in people with recent experience of a close friend or relative's death or dying. Where the views of patients, families, and professionals were compared, all respondents broadly agreed although patients expressed the strongest home preferences. Only 2 of the studies provided longitudinal data, and 9 of the 18 had major deficits in design or reporting, such as poor or unknown response rate, unclear or unsystematic methods of eliciting preferences or other sample or measurement bias. However, sensitivity analysis of only the more robust and larger studies did not alter the finding of a preference for home care at the end of life in over 50% of patients. Conclusions: Home care is the most common preference, with inpatient hospice care as second preference in advanced illness. Meeting these preferences could be important outcomes for services. Study designs in this area need to be improved.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- When Death Comes: Where Should Patients Die?The Hospice Journal, 1996
- The role of specialist home care teams: views of general practitioners in south LondonPalliative Medicine, 1995
- Reducing hospital beds for patients with advanced cancerThe Lancet, 1994
- Can home care maintain an acceptable quality of life for patients with terminal cancer and their relatives?Palliative Medicine, 1994
- Attitudes to some aspects of death and dying, living wills and substituted health care decision-making in South Australia: public opinion survey for a parliamentary select committeePalliative Medicine, 1993
- Staff support groups: do they support and are they even groups?Palliative Medicine, 1993
- Attitudes Towards Care of the Dying: A Questionnaire Survey of General Practice AttendersFamily Practice, 1991
- Death and dying: perceptions and attitudes in ItalyPalliative Medicine, 1991
- Racial Differences in Attitudes Toward Hospice CareThe Hospice Journal, 1990
- Terminal care at home: perspective from general practice.BMJ, 1986