Adaptive Signature Design: An Adaptive Clinical Trial Design for Generating and Prospectively Testing A Gene Expression Signature for Sensitive Patients
Top Cited Papers
- 1 November 2005
- journal article
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Clinical Cancer Research
- Vol. 11 (21), 7872-7878
- https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-05-0605
Abstract
Purpose: A new generation of molecularly targeted agents is entering the definitive stage of clinical evaluation. Many of these drugs benefit only a subset of treated patients and may be overlooked by the traditional, broad-eligibility approach to randomized clinical trials. Thus, there is a need for development of novel statistical methodology for rapid evaluation of these agents. Experimental Design: We propose a new adaptive design for randomized clinical trials of targeted agents in settings where an assay or signature that identifies sensitive patients is not available at the outset of the study. The design combines prospective development of a gene expression–based classifier to select sensitive patients with a properly powered test for overall effect. Results: Performance of the adaptive design, relative to the more traditional design, is evaluated in a simulation study. It is shown that when the proportion of patients sensitive to the new drug is low, the adaptive design substantially reduces the chance of false rejection of effective new treatments. When the new treatment is broadly effective, the adaptive design has power to detect the overall effect similar to the traditional design. Formulas are provided to determine the situations in which the new design is advantageous. Conclusion: Development of a gene expression–based classifier to identify the subset of sensitive patients can be prospectively incorporated into a randomized phase III design without compromising the ability to detect an overall effect.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of Randomized Discontinuation DesignJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- Evaluating the Efficiency of Targeted Designs for Randomized Clinical TrialsClinical Cancer Research, 2004
- An agenda for Clinical Trials: clinical trials in the genomic eraClinical Trials, 2004
- A testing procedure for survival data with few respondersStatistics in Medicine, 2004
- Targeting epidermal growth factor receptor—are we missing the mark?The Lancet, 2003
- Improving the evaluation of new cancer treatments: challenges and opportunitiesNature Reviews Cancer, 2003
- Influence of Unrecognized Molecular Heterogeneity on Randomized Clinical TrialsJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2002
- Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma outcome prediction by gene-expression profiling and supervised machine learningNature Medicine, 2002
- Bagging predictorsMachine Learning, 1996
- Special study designs: early escape, enrichment, studies in non-respondersCommunications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 1994