Abstract
The introduction of the Oligocene stage into our classification has necessitated a partial revision of the grouping of our older British Tertiaries. Whether this introduction of a new primary division into the Tertiary system was necessary or expedient may still be questioned; but it has been generally adopted and is, for the time being, established. The division does not coincide in England with a marked change in either fauna or flora, though the series seems nevertheless tolerably complete and well developed; its limits, however widely stretched, show that the Oligocene stage compares neither with the Eocene nor the Miocene in importance.